Mathematics: Mathematics Education 1, 5.5 credits

Matematik: Matematikdidaktik 1, 5.5 hp

91MA16

Main field of study

Mathematics

Course level

First cycle

Course type

Programme course

Examiner

Peter Frejd

Course coordinator

Peter Frejd

Director of studies or equivalent

Jesper Thorén
ECV = Elective / Compulsory / Voluntary
Course offered for Semester Weeks Language Campus ECV
L2A79 Secondary School Teacher Programme - Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School, Subject Mathematics, 240 hp (Subject: Mathematics) 1 (Autumn 2021) 202134-202203 Swedish Linköping, Valla E
L1AGY Secondary School Teacher Programme - Upper-Secondary, School Subject Mathematics, 300 Credits (Subjcet: Mathematics) 1 (Autumn 2021) 202134-202203 Swedish Linköping, Valla E

Main field of study

Mathematics

Course level

First cycle

Advancement level

G1X

Course offered for

  • Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School
  • Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in the Upper-Secondary School

Examination

Applies to all courses regardless of grading scale.

  • Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.

If the course has a three-graded grading scale (U - VG), following applies:

  • Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.

If the course is a VfU course, the following applies:

  • Examination of applied social and didactic abilities is limited to three (3) occasions.

The following applies to courses that include a compulsory component:

  • If special circumstances prevail, and if it is possible with consideration of the nature of the compulsory component, the examiner may decide to replace the compulsory component with another equivalent component.

If the LiU coordinator for students with disabilities has granted a student the right to an adapted examination for a written examination in an examination hall, the student has the right to it. If the coordinator has instead recommended for the student an adapted examination or alternative form of examination, the examiner may grant this if the examiner assesses that it is possible, based on consideration of the course objectives.

Grades

Three-grade scale, U, G, VG

Other information

Course revised 2020-04-02; Dnr LiU-2020-01361

Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus.

The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.

About teaching and examination language

The teaching language is presented in the Overview tab for each course. The examination language relates to the teaching language as follows: 

  • If teaching language is Swedish, the course as a whole or in large parts, is taught in Swedish. Please note that although teaching language is Swedish, parts of the course could be given in English. Examination language is Swedish. 
  • If teaching language is Swedish/English, the course as a whole will be taught in English if students without prior knowledge of the Swedish language participate. Examination language is Swedish or English (depending on teaching language). 
  • If teaching language is English, the course as a whole is taught in English. Examination language is English. 

Department

Matematiska institutionen
Code Name Scope Grading scale
MRE1 Oral presentation 1 credits U, G
SRE2 Written presentation 1.5 credits U, G, VG
SRE1 Oral presentation with a written assignment 3 credits U, G
Bergsten, C. m. fl (1997). Algebra för alla. Nämnaren Tema. Göteborg: NCM Brandell, G., & Pettersson, A. (Red.). (2011) Matematikundervisning. Vetenskapliga perspektiv. Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag Gustafsson, L. & Mouwitz, L. (2002). Vuxna och matematik - ett livsviktigt ämne. Göteborg: NCM. Jablonka, E. (2009). Mathematics for all: why? what? when? In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education. Proceedings from NORMA08 in Copenhagen, April 21 - April 25, 2008. (pp. 293-306). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. James, M. C., & Willoughby, S. (2011). Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might surprise you! American Journal of Physics, 79(1), 123. Niss, M. (1994). Mathematics in society. In R. Biehler et al. (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 367-378). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Skolverkets kursplaner och betygskriterier i matematik. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in‐class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–4. Wieman, C. et al. (2009). Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructor’s Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Response Systems (Clickers) in Teaching.

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page.

There are no files available for this course.