Mathematcis Education 1, 5.5 credits (91MAD1)

Matematik: Didaktik 1, 5.5 hp

Main field of study



First cycle

Course type

Programme course

Main field of study


Course level

First cycle

Advancement level


Course offered for

  • Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in the Upper-Secondary School
  • Secondary School Teacher Programme with a specialization in Teaching in Grades 7-9 of the Compulsory School


Students failing an exam covering either the entire course or part of the course two times are entitled to have a new examiner appointed for the reexamination.

Students who have passed an examination may not retake it in order to improve their grades.


Three-grade scale, U, G, VG

Other information

Planning and implementation of a course must take its starting point in the wording of the syllabus. The course evaluation included in each course must therefore take up the question how well the course agrees with the syllabus. The course is carried out in such a way that both men´s and women´s experience and knowledge is made visible and developed.


Matematiska institutionen
Bergsten, C. m. fl (1997). Algebra för alla. Nämnaren Tema. Göteborg: NCM Brandell, G., & Pettersson, A. (Red.). (2011) Matematikundervisning. Vetenskapliga perspektiv. Stockholm: Stockholms universitets förlag Gustafsson, L. & Mouwitz, L. (2002). Vuxna och matematik - ett livsviktigt ämne. Göteborg: NCM. Jablonka, E. (2009). Mathematics for all: why? what? when? In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic research in mathematics education. Proceedings from NORMA08 in Copenhagen, April 21 - April 25, 2008. (pp. 293-306). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. James, M. C., & Willoughby, S. (2011). Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might surprise you! American Journal of Physics, 79(1), 123. Niss, M. (1994). Mathematics in society. In R. Biehler et al. (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 367-378). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Skolverkets kursplaner och betygskriterier i matematik. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in‐class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–4. Wieman, C. et al. (2009). Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructor’s Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Response Systems (Clickers) in Teaching.

No examination details is to be found.

This tab contains public material from the course room in Lisam. The information published here is not legally binding, such material can be found under the other tabs on this page. There are no files available for this course.

Page responsible: Info Centre,