The article draws on Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality. This concept views governance as a “problematizing activity,” where that which is to be governed is made visible as a specific type of problem for the just and green transition. The way in which the problem is represented becomes decisive for the kinds of interventions considered necessary to correct it in the desired direction. The study identifies three problematized objects:
1. Europe’s coal-based infrastructure and high-emitting industries, for which the just and green transition, through investments in breakthrough technologies and green innovation hubs, is framed as an opportunity for renewed competitiveness and growth.
2. European communities reliant on coal-mining and heavy industry, where involvement and education are intended to create future-oriented and entrepreneurial green regions and workers. These measures also aim to generate positive attitudes toward the transition among the “new” regions and workers.
3. Europe’s disillusioned youth, who through platforms, workshops, and podcasts are shaped to become partners in the green transition and help catalyse change. The enthusiasm of young people needs to be channelled in support of a green European future.
In summary, the authors conclude that the EU uses soft governance tools to create self-regulating industries, regions, workers, and citizens who support and drive the transition. The transition is framed as both necessary and desirable, with the climate crisis presented as an opportunity for modernization, competitiveness, and social justice.
The article is titled The Will to Decarbonize: Problematizing European Just Transition Governance and is published in Environmental Policy and Governance. It is available for free download here: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70019