In my research, I study biogas production from various systemic perspectives. Among other things, I have examined whether the production and use of biogas at a food processing facility is more profitable if it takes place on-site at the facility rather than at an external biogas plant. This was also analyzed from an environmental perspective. The results showed that it is better—from both an economic and an environmental perspective—to produce biogas on-site at food processing facilities and to use that biogas on-site.
Emma Lindkvist
Assistant Professor
By studying biogas from different systemic perspectives, we can determine how biogas provides the greatest environmental and economic benefits. Both nationally and internationally.
Energy system analysis shows where biogas is most beneficial
Biogas is a renewable energy source produced from biomass.
Biogas production also yields digestate, which can be used as biofertilizer. Using the digestate allows for the recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus back into farmland. The biogas produced can be used to generate heat and electricity, or upgraded to natural gas quality and then injected into the natural gas grid or used as vehicle fuel.
In my research, I study biogas production from various systemic perspectives. Among other things, I have examined whether the production and use of biogas at a food processing facility is more profitable if it takes place on-site at the facility rather than at an external biogas plant. This was also analyzed from an environmental perspective. The results showed that it is better—from both an economic and an environmental perspective—to produce biogas on-site at food processing facilities and to use that biogas on-site.
In my research, I study biogas production from various systemic perspectives. Among other things, I have examined whether the production and use of biogas at a food processing facility is more profitable if it takes place on-site at the facility rather than at an external biogas plant. This was also analyzed from an environmental perspective. The results showed that it is better—from both an economic and an environmental perspective—to produce biogas on-site at food processing facilities and to use that biogas on-site.
Short texts
Academic Degree
Master of Science in Ecosystem Engineering, LTH 2013Publications
2026
Energy efficiency first for homes? Public priorities, barriers and residential energy choices in six European countries
Energy Efficiency, Vol. 19, Article 74
(Article in journal)
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12053-026-10478-7
Reply to Missing the goal: Comments on a comparative life cycle assessment of natural and artificial football turf, by Säberg et al. (2025)
Cleaner Environmental Systems, Vol. 23, Article 100525
(Article in journal)
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2026.100525
Biogasscenarier: Produktion och användning av biogas i Sverige till 2035
(Report)
https://dx.doi.org/10.3384/9789181186635
Barriers to and drivers for environmental, energy, and water management practices in football facilities-Toward increased sustainability in the sports community
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, Vol. 7, Article 1845069
(Article in journal)
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1845069
From fossil fuels to renewables: an analysis of fuel transition in Swedish heavy transport and industry
Biofuels, Vol. 17, p. 214-225
(Article in journal)
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2025.2523641