The Multitemporal Horizons of Environmental Activism: Narratives of Ecological End-time(s) in Global Environmentalism, ca. 1970-2025
Environmental activism's narratives are shaped by multitemporal horizons, challenging the idea of time as homogenous and linear. By describing future ecological end-time(s), environmental activists of the 1970s advocated present change to prevent these futures. However, the 2010s upsurge in climate activism has brought new horizons that conflict with the above-mentioned. The ecological end-time is no longer put forward in a future tense but a present one; we are living in a (post)apocalyptic condition. But what happens with long-standing environmental activist organizations' conceptions of time when they clash against new and radical temporal horizons?
By exploring key narratives from Greenpeace International and Friends of the Earth International, the purpose of the project is to contribute to the understanding of contemporary environmental activism and the trajectories of the environmental movement. The aim is to identify and analyze the multitemporal horizons that global environmental activism has been entangled in, challenged, and (re)produced over a fifty-year period.
The project is funded by the Swedish Research Council, 2025-2028.
The Utopian Dystopias of Climate Activism
This research focuses on conceptualizations of time within contemporary climate activism. This is done by examining how temporalities of climate change are addressed in international climate activism, with special attention to the youth climate movement. By synthesizing theories and methods from conceptual history and critical utopian studies, the project maps out how the activists’ climate change narratives interrelate past, present, and future, the expression of the negotiation of contingency between temporalities, and what this means for promoting visions of possible futures.
Visions of the Good Future: Sustainable Development and Long-term Political Thinking in the Swedish Climate Debate, 1970-2025
This project aimed at analyzing ideas about political rooms of maneuver in a temporal sense, with special focus on Swedish climate politics.
The project has shown how the political parties understood the concept of sustainable development as a complex situated at the intersection of sustainability and development. For long, development constituted the dominant part of the concept while being closely associated with ideas of continuous improvement within a growth discourse. Sustainability was primarily given a moderating function, to control the expected improvement and to give shine to goals formulated in terms of economic growth. To encompass all dimensions of sustainable development, the concept of sustainable society was put forward. This concept should hence be understood as an umbrella concept under which specific forms of sustainable development was integrated.
The project has empirically shown how the postpolitical condition, which previously has mainly been discussed at a theoretical level, came to characterize the Swedish climate debate. The research shows how the Swedish election debates and campaigns - a domain that is traditionally characterized by political vocabulary and politicization - gradually adopted a universalist language which made it problematic to name political subjectivities.
The project was funded by Riksbankens jubileumsfond, 2018-2022.
Democracy Beyond Politics
I completed my doctorate at the Department of Humanities at Mid Sweden University in 2013. My dissertation Democracy Beyond Politics is an analysis of the changing meaning(s) of the concept of democracy as it was used by the Swedish Social Democratic Party (SAP) during the years after the introduction of universal suffrage.
The analysis shows that the profound changes in society provided impetus for a continuous renegotiation of meanings, allowing concepts to retain their explanatory power under changing circumstances. At the same time the SAP needed new ways to express what kind of society the party strived to realize. The party did not limit itself to only one concept of democracy but instead used several composite concepts, e.g. political democracy and economic democracy. I argue that the use of composite concepts should be understood as a re-temporalization of the concept of democracy. The analysis shows how the composite concepts pointed forward in time, toward new political goals that reached far beyond the political sphere.
