annel80

Ann Catrine Eldh

Professor

Implementation science is about e.g. barriers and facilitators to knowledge implementation, in short and long term perspectives. My research is about the engagement of leaders, staff and patients in implementation processes in healthcare.

Presentation

Two central research areas for safe health care of good quality.

Securing quality in health care – what can be more important? In my research, this is about identifying barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice and collaboration between stakeholders – as well as investigating interventions to secure that the health care provided is based on the best available knowledge. As a consequence, my research corresponds to two related fields within caring science: knowledge implementation and patient participation.

Knowledge implementation and patient participation – partners for the future

Patient participation and knowledge implementation highlights are: what is evidence, and which interventions works in what context, in order to overcome the lack of correspondence between what may be established practice and what is recognised to be best practice in health care. These are important questions to secure evidence-based practice, during and following a change, where staff, managers and patients and their next of kin ought to have opportunities to participate.

Publications

Cover of publication ''
Ann Catrine Eldh, Liselott Arestedt, Carina Berterö (2020)

International Journal of Qualitative Methods , Vol.19 Continue to DOI

Cover of publication ''
Ann Catrine Eldh, Marie Holmefur, Kristina Luhr, Marika Wenemark (2020)

BMC Health Services Research , Vol.20 Continue to DOI

2024

Patricia Sköld, Maria Halleberg-Nyman, Eva Joelsson-Alm, Ann Catrine Eldh (2024) Patient participation in orthopaedic care-a survey on hip surgery patients' preferences for and experiences of engagement in their health and healthcare International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing, Vol. 54, Article 101118 (Article in journal) Continue to DOI
Hanna Vestala, Marcus Bendtsen, Patrik Midlov, Karin Kjellgren, Ann Catrine Eldh (2024) Is patient participation in hypertension care based on patients' preferences? A cross-sectional study in primary healthcare European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (Article in journal) Continue to DOI
Caroline Hurtig, Liselott Arestedt, Fredrik Uhlin, Ann Catrine Eldh (2024) Patient participation-18 months of patient and staff perspectives in kidney care: A mixed methods study addressing the effects of facilitating staff person-centredness Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice (Article in journal) Continue to DOI
Erika Fjordkvist, Maria Haelleberg Nyman, Madeleine Winberg, Eva Joelsson-Alm, Ann Catrine Eldh (2024) First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation in orthopaedic nursing and rehabilitation: a qualitative study BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 24, Article 871 (Article in journal) Continue to DOI
Bo Kim, Marcel Yotebieng, Ann Catrine Eldh (2024) Hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial designs-critical assessments, innovative applications, and proposed advancements Frontiers in Health Services, Vol. 4, Article 1414969 (Article in journal) Continue to DOI

Research

Knowledge implementation

A central aspect of evidence-based practice

The potential difficulties in facilitation knowledge translation are well known but an increased focus on implementation science scaffolds opportunities to improve healthcare services. The theories, models and frameworks aid a further understanding of barriers and facilitators for more evidence-based practice. The knowledge of which methods to use in different contexts is also growing even if there is still a need for research on improvement processes, to ensure sustainable implementation.

Patient participation and healthcare improvements

Personcentred patient participation requires a mutual respect of knowledge and experiences. To enable healthcare interactions with such conditions, there is a need for innovative strategies and tools. Previously, I developed and validated a tool for preference-based patient participation – The 4Ps (acronym for Patient Preferences for Patient Participation). In current studies we test strategies to implement preference-based patient participation, and the 4Ps is also used to follow-up on clinical interventions. The 4Ps is available for research and clinical purposes following an agreement with me.

Related research

Organisation