Space, place, writing and globalization
Funded by the Swedish Research Council (2018–2020), my present research project is called “Writing in Transit: The Poetics and Politics of Space in Contemporary Literature” (joint with Andreas Nyblom). Our working hypothesis is that writing is currently being rethought in terms of its spatial connotations. Contemporary literature increasingly seems to link writing to spaces of transit and transport, and real equivalents of such spaces (e.g. Heathrow Airport and Amtrak) engage writers in residence to write at the airport or on board trains.
Associating writing with mobility, urban public spaces and globalised modernity poses significant challenges to traditional ideas of literary creation – and when transit space is perceived as a vital literary space, it seems to question recognised theories of such locations as non-places. The main purpose of our project is thus to examine the relationship of contemporary constructions of writing space and authorship to the increased spatial mobility of society. From the perspective of three spaces of transit – airports, trains and underground railways – the project will analyse the poetics (aesthetic objectives) and politics (aspects of power and publicity) involved when those spaces are invoked by writers and other agents, either by choice or by commission.
Idleness, withdrawal and the essay
A lasting research interest of mine has been the essay genre and essayism as a particular mode of thinking and writing. The recently published Att slå dank med virtuositet: Reträtten, sysslolösheten och essän (ellerströms, 2018, written in Swedish) sums up my work on the essay in a specific context: the aim has been to explore the essay and essayistic discourse in relation to motifs like idleness, leisure and retirement/withdrawal from society.
Since Michel de Montaigne, the image of the gentleman amateur with enough time on his hands to read, write and contemplate has often been cherished among essayists. Claiming that idleness was one of his chief characteristics, Montaigne modelled his withdrawn and idle existence on the ideal of the contemplative life, recommended by ancient philosophers as well as Christian church fathers, but turned it into a secular art of living. In the centuries that followed, contemplative idleness served as a key feature in the self-fashioning of many essayists, but since the rise of industrialism and capitalism, and due to changing conceptions and more positive evaluations of work (the idea of the ‘work-ethic’ in particular), the posture as idler or the essayistic praise of idleness grew increasingly problematic and contradictory.
Possibly, the concurrent professionalization of the author brought major challenges to this self-understanding of the essayist as well, and to the belief in the importance of idle contemplation for creativity at large. In my book, I follow the intertwinings of the essay and motifs of idleness and withdrawal from the point of view of four essayists/essayistic writers from different periods: Michel de Montaigne, Charles Lamb, Virginia Woolf and Jenny Diski.
The major part of my teaching has been conducted in comparative literature at Linköping University. In connection with my research, I have developed a course on the essay genre, “Essän från Montaigne till medieåldern” (“The essay from Montaigne to the media age”), as well as a course on the themes of idleness and leisure in literary history, “Lättjans litteratur”, comprising examples from Homer and Seneca to Valerie Solanas and J.M. Coetzee.