03 September 2021

When women gained the right to vote, it was not the dawn of universal suffrage in Sweden. The poor and criminals were excluded from the voting system, and even today certain groups remain so.

Young girl protesting
Citizens under the age of 18 do not have the right to vote in Sweden. Photo: The People's Climate March", Oslo, Norway. rrodrickbeiler

“Our democracy does not involve only inclusion: exclusion is also a factor. The right to vote has always been subject to limitations. And it remains so today”, says Jonathan Josefsson, assistant professor in the Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University.

Who has the right to vote is linked to the idea of who is “appropriate” in different periods. Before women gained the right to vote, they were considered to be irrational, incompetent and too poorly educated to take decisions about something as important as politics.

“The arguments for denying women the vote are extremely similar to the arguments used today to explain why children and young people are not allowed to vote”, says Jonathan Josefsson.

Jonathan Josefsson conducts research into the citizenship of children and young people in contemporary democracies. He is a member of the “Universal suffrage? Voting restrictions and disenfranchisement in Sweden after 1921” research project, where, together with colleague Bengt Sandin, he studies the political debate around age and the right to vote in the 20th century. He believes that it is important to celebrate the centenary of women gaining the right to vote. At the same time, he points out that many groups remained for a long time – and some still remain – without the right to vote.

“It’s extremely important to be self-critical at a jubilee. It’s a good opportunity to reflect about one’s assumptions. Who gets to vote today – and who doesn’t? On what grounds? And whose voting rights are limited by various practical and structural factors?”

Young people lost it when women gained it

The fact is that when women gained the right to vote, others lost it, as the consequence of a political agreement. During negotiations about the right to vote for women, it was agreed to raise the voting age for the two chambers of the parliamentary structure at the time. It was raised from 21 to 27 years for elections to the county councils and first chamber. The age for voting in elections to the second chamber had been raised from 21 to 24 years in 1909, and this was adjusted to 23 years in 1921. The age for the right to vote in municipal elections was at the same time raised from 21 to 23 years.

Children are not considered sufficiently capable to vote. But are adults sufficiently capable? When President Trump made comments about Greta Thunberg on Twitter, you can ask yourself who appeared to be the more competent and rational of the two.
Jonathan Josefsson, assistant professor

We see that even after 1921, when women voted for the first time, restrictions in the right to vote have been in place. Those in prison were not permitted to vote until 1937, and the poor remained disenfranchised right up until 1945, since it was considered that they were incapable of taking decisions that concerned society and the public good. It was not until 1989 that legally incompetent persons could vote.

A group of people who have had the same right to vote as anyone else, while at the same time being unable to exercise that right, are travellers. Municipalities sometimes prevented travellers from registering as resident, which in practice meant that they could not use their right to vote.

Groups that remain disenfranchised

Two groups that cannot vote in national elections today are people who live in Sweden, but are not Swedish citizens, and people younger than 18 years. People without citizenship who have been registered in Sweden for at least three years can vote in regional and municipal elections, while people under 18 cannot vote at all.
In several other countries, however, such as Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Argentina, Brazil and Jordan, children and young people older than, for example, 16 years can vote in national and local elections.

“Sweden makes a big thing of being a country that protects the rights of children. Even so, it’s accepted that various institutions look after children’s rights, and young people are not given the right to express their own political opinions by voting.”

Jonathan Josefsson believes that in Sweden we take for granted the limitations on the rights of children and young people to vote.

“Children are not considered sufficiently capable to vote. But are adults sufficiently capable? When President Trump made comments about Greta Thunberg on Twitter, you can ask yourself who appeared to be the more competent and rational of the two.”

Thus, looking back over the past 100 years shows that different groups have at different times been allowed to cast their votes. Many have been included among those allowed to vote, but it’s not obvious that democracy is solely inclusive. Earlier in 2021, Jimmie Åkesson (SD) suggested that only Swedish citizens should be allowed to vote in elections.

This would mean that all those who live in Sweden without being Swedish citizens, who previously have been able to vote in regional and municipal elections, would lose this right. Also in the US, we are seeing a heated political conflict about the right to vote in both national and state elections.

“Many people believe that democracy can only increase, but this is not something we can take for granted. At the moment, we can see in some cases that democracy is in retreat, or at least not advancing.”

Translated by George Farrants

Contact and facts

Picture of Elnaz Baghlanian.

Literature is at the core of a well-functioning democracy

How does literature affect us? And most importantly: if a society lacks literature, what happens? These are questions that occupy Elnaz Baghlanian, previously Alumna of the Year at Linköping University and now operational manager at Writers’ Centre.

Helena Iacobaeus.

Distance democracy during the pandemic

During the pandemic, we have seen how municipalities have held council meetings in sports arenas or outdoors. They have reduced the number of participants through voter offsetting and have transitioned to digital meetings at a record pace.

Photo of the flag of the Swedish Church blowing in the wind against a blue sky with small clouds.

How should the church be governed?

The elections for the Church of Sweden will be held on 19 September. This year the focus is on how political the church should be, but the agenda also includes issues such as the environment, economy and education.

Niklas Ekdal.

Reluctance to take responsibility threat to democracy

Democracy is a fortunate exception. Rule by the people is threatened by power-hungry strongmen, by conflicts between parties and groups, and by a reluctance to take responsibility. But help can come from unexpected places.

Anonymous woman votes.

Local democracy requires brave decision-makers

Every period faces challenges to democracy that must be faced. Threats and internet hate, for example, are serious problems for democracy in municipalities. Even so, local politics functions well, all things considered.

Angela Fontan and Claudio Altafini discuss signed network theory.

Forming a government – how long will it take?

Researchers at LiU have used a new method to calculate how long it can take to form a government after a general election. They have also used the method to predict which political coalition is the most probable outcome.

People in a que to vote in a mall.

Who votes in Sweden?

Voting rights and voter turnout are core concepts in democracies. Consequently, how many and which people vote are important indicators of how a democracy performs. Sweden has a high voter turnout but there are differences between groups.

People sit at table talking.

50-year-old aims to foster democracy

The Folk High School Teacher Programme at Linköping University has turned fifty. But its aim of strengthening and developing democracy is just as relevant as when it started – if not more.