International negotiations survey

Many people in a room at a climate meeting.

The International Negotiations Survey is a research program with the aim to advance interdisciplinary knowledge using questionnaire data collected at international negotiations.

The International Negotiations Survey team has conducted questionnaire studies since 2007. The database contains around 900 responses for each conference covered from delegates to the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), participants in side events, as well as side-event organizers. The survey, which is undertaken with the agreement of the UNFCCC Secretariat, has been on-going since the climate change negotiations in Bali 2007.

The survey measures individual preferences on a variety of topics at the negotiations, such as the role of non-state actors, leadership, the effectiveness of various solutions to tackle climate change, principles for effort sharing of commitments, and Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions by developing countries. It includes a number of questions held constant over time as well as questions that vary from year to year. The dataset thereby offers unique empirical material for understanding attitudes and opinions held by the diverse participants at the international climate change negotiations.

Contact

Researchers

Marie Francisco

PhD student

Sara Gottenhuber

PhD student

Maria Jernnäs

Assistant Professor

Björn-Ola Linnér

Professor

Victoria Wibeck

Professor

Questionnaires and publications

Questionnaires used during the previous UNFCCC conferences

Questionnaires used 2016

At COP22/CMP12 in Marrakech, the following two surveys were distributed:

General questionnaire COP22

Side event questionnaire COP22

Questionnaires used 2015

At COP21/CMP11 in Paris, the following two surveys were distributed:

General questionnaire COP21

Side event questionnaire COP21

At SB in Bonn, the following two surveys were distributed:

General questionnaire, SB42

Side event questionnaire, SB42

Questionnaires used 2014

At COP20/CMP10 in Lima, the following two surveys were distributed:

General questionnaire 2014

Side event questionnaire 2014

Questionnaires used 2013

At COP19/CMP9 in Warsaw, the following two surveys were distributed:

General questionnaire 2013

Side event questionnaire 2013

Survey of support providers’ NAMA preferences

This online questionnaire, open during fall 2013, surveyed opinions on the best use of public finance in international support of NAMAs. The questionnaire was part of the research project “GovNAMAs”, financed by the Swedish Energy Agency, to improve knowledge on how to successfully match design and support of NAMAs. For questions, contact Mathias Fridahl (mathias.fridahl@liu.se).

Data

The results from this dataset have been published in Fridahl, M., Hagemann, M., Röser, F., and Amars, L. (2015). A Comparison of Design and Support Priorities of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions. Journal of Environment and Development.

For previous years’ questionnaires, please contact us.

Publications that analyse the International Negotiations Survey data

Peer reviewed publications

Pre- and Post-Paris Views on Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage
Fridahl, M. (2019).
In: Pires, J. C. & Gonçalves, A. L. (eds.) Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage: Using Natural Resources for Sustainable Development. New York: Elsevier.

Making climate governance global: how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime
Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B.-O. (2017).
Environmental Politics, 26(4): 580–599.

Socio-political prioritization of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Fridahl, M. (2017).
Energy Policy, 104: 89–99.

Assessing the European Union’s global climate change leadership: from Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement
Parker, C., Karlsson, C. and Hjerpe, M. (2017).
Journal of European Integration, 39(2): 239–252.

Climate Change Leaders and Followers: Leadership Recognition and Selection in the UNFCCC Negotiations
Parker, C., Karlsson, K. and Hjerpe, M. (2015).
International Relations, 29(4): 434–454.

Normative arguments for non-state actor participation in international policymaking processes: Functionalism, neocorporatism or democratic pluralism?
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. and Bäckstrand, K. (2016).
European Journal of International Relations, 22(4): 920–943.

Views on alternative forums for effectively tackling climate change
Hjerpe, M. and Nasiritousi, N. (2015).
Nature Climate Change, 5: 864–867.

Perspectives on the Green Climate Fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation
Fridahl, M. and Linnér. B.-O. (2015).
Climate and Development, 8(2): 105–109.

A Comparison of Design and Support Priorities of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions
Fridahl, M., Hagemann, M., Röser, F. and Amars, L. (2015).
Journal of Environment and Development, 24(2): 237–264.

Pluralising climate change solutions? Views held and voiced by participants at the international climate change negotiations
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. and Buhr, K. (2014).
Ecological Economics, 105: 177–184.

Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations.
Friman, M., and Hjerpe, M. (2015).
Climate Policy, 15(3): 302–320.

The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B.-O. (2014).
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16: 109–126.

Climate Change Politics through a Global Pledge-and-Review Regime: Positions among Negotiators and Stakeholders
Buhr, K., Roth, S. and Stigson, P. (2014).
Sustainability, 6(2): 794–811.

Expectations on corporate climate action under regulatory uncertainty
Buhr, K. and Hjerpe, M. (2012).
International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 4(4): 403–419.

Fragmented Climate Change Leadership: Making Sense of the Ambiguous COP-15 Outcome
Parker, C., Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M. and Linner, B.-O. (2012).
Environmental Politics, 21(2): 268–286.

The Legitimacy of Leadership in International Climate Change Negotiations
Karlsson, C., Parker, C., Hjerpe, M. and Linnér. B.-O. (2012).
Ambio, 41(S1): 46–55.

A Registry for Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions: Goals, Outcomes and Institutional Requisites
Linnér, B.-O. and Pahuja, N. (2012).
Ambio, 41, (S1): 56–67.

Looking for Leaders: Perceptions of Climate Change Leadership among Climate Change Negotiation Participants
Karlsson, C., Parker, C., Hjerpe, M. and Linner, B.-O. (2011).
Global Environmental Politics, 11, 1: 89–107.

Functions of COP side-events in climate change governance
Hjerpe, M. and Linnér, B.-O. (2010). Climate Policy, 10 2: 167–180.

Reports and working papers

The function of side events at the Conference of the Parties to The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Hjerpe M., Linnér B., Simonsson L., Wråke, M. and Zetterberg, L. (2008).
Linköping: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research CSPR Report 08:2. IVL report. B, 1804.

Common ground for effort sharing? Preferred principles for distributing climate mitigation efforts.
Hjerpe, M., Löfgren, Å., Linnér, B.-O., Hennlock, M., Sterner, T. and Jagers, S. (2011).
University of Gothenburg Publications Electronic Archive.

Organisation

bilden visar stenar i vatten. Pictures shows stones in vater

Environmental Change (TEMAM)

Almost all nature bears traces of human activity. Its condition is strongly linked to social development. This creates a need for scientific breadth and problem-solving skills. Education and research at Environmental Change respond to this challenge.

Drone image of the Tema building at Campus Valla

Department of Thematic Studies (TEMA)

In an increasingly complicated world, there is a need for researchers that can handle both breadth and depth, and can collaborate across disciplinary borders. Major societal questions are studied from an interdisciplinary perspective at TEMA.

Studenthuset on Campus Valla in Linköping

About LiU

Linköping University, LiU, offers innovative education and boundary-crossing research. The students are among the most desirable in the labour market and international rankings consistently place LiU as a leading global university.